Commit 5eac1280 authored by Adam Chlipala's avatar Adam Chlipala

Code for type-checking example

parent 25fa3310
......@@ -367,3 +367,128 @@ let rec eq_nat_dec' n m0 =
| O -> false
| S n1 -> eq_nat_dec' n0 n1)
</pre># *)
(** %\smallskip%
We can build "smart" versions of the usual boolean operators and put them to good use in certified programming. For instance, here is a [sumbool] version of boolean "or." *)
Notation "x || y" := (if x then Yes else Reduce y) (at level 50).
(** Let us use it for building a function that decides list membership. We need to assume the existence of an equality decision procedure for the type of list elements. *)
Section In_dec.
Variable A : Set.
Variable A_eq_dec : forall x y : A, {x = y} + {x <> y}.
(** The final function is easy to write using the techniques we have developed so far. *)
Definition In_dec : forall (x : A) (ls : list A), {In x ls} + { ~In x ls}.
refine (fix f (x : A) (ls : list A) {struct ls}
: {In x ls} + { ~In x ls} :=
match ls return {In x ls} + { ~In x ls} with
| nil => No
| x' :: ls' => A_eq_dec x x' || f x ls'
end); crush.
Qed.
End In_dec.
(** [In_dec] has a reasonable extraction to OCaml. *)
Extraction In_dec.
(** %\begin{verbatim}
(** val in_dec : ('a1 -> 'a1 -> bool) -> 'a1 -> 'a1 list -> bool **)
let rec in_dec a_eq_dec x = function
| Nil -> false
| Cons (x', ls') ->
(match a_eq_dec x x' with
| true -> true
| false -> in_dec a_eq_dec x ls')
\end{verbatim}%
#<pre>
(** val in_dec : ('a1 -> 'a1 -> bool) -> 'a1 -> 'a1 list -> bool **)
let rec in_dec a_eq_dec x = function
| Nil -> false
| Cons (x', ls') ->
(match a_eq_dec x x' with
| true -> true
| false -> in_dec a_eq_dec x ls')
</pre># *)
(** * Partial Subset Types *)
Inductive maybe (A : Type) (P : A -> Prop) : Set :=
| Unknown : maybe P
| Found : forall x : A, P x -> maybe P.
Notation "{{ x | P }}" := (maybe (fun x => P)).
Notation "??" := (Unknown _).
Notation "[[ x ]]" := (Found _ x _).
Notation "x <- e1 ; e2" := (match e1 with
| Unknown => ??
| Found x _ => e2
end)
(right associativity, at level 60).
Notation "e1 ;; e2" := (if e1 then e2 else ??)
(right associativity, at level 60).
(** * A Type-Checking Example *)
Inductive exp : Set :=
| Nat : nat -> exp
| Plus : exp -> exp -> exp
| Bool : bool -> exp
| And : exp -> exp -> exp.
Inductive type : Set := TNat | TBool.
Inductive hasType : exp -> type -> Prop :=
| HtNat : forall n,
hasType (Nat n) TNat
| HtPlus : forall e1 e2,
hasType e1 TNat
-> hasType e2 TNat
-> hasType (Plus e1 e2) TNat
| HtBool : forall b,
hasType (Bool b) TBool
| HtAnd : forall e1 e2,
hasType e1 TBool
-> hasType e2 TBool
-> hasType (And e1 e2) TBool.
Definition eq_type_dec : forall (t1 t2 : type), {t1 = t2} + {t1 <> t2}.
decide equality.
Defined.
Definition typeCheck (e : exp) : {{t | hasType e t}}.
Hint Constructors hasType.
refine (fix F (e : exp) : {{t | hasType e t}} :=
match e return {{t | hasType e t}} with
| Nat _ => [[TNat]]
| Plus e1 e2 =>
t1 <- F e1;
t2 <- F e2;
eq_type_dec t1 TNat;;
eq_type_dec t2 TNat;;
[[TNat]]
| Bool _ => [[TBool]]
| And e1 e2 =>
t1 <- F e1;
t2 <- F e2;
eq_type_dec t1 TBool;;
eq_type_dec t2 TBool;;
[[TBool]]
end); crush.
Defined.
Eval simpl in typeCheck (Nat 0).
Eval simpl in typeCheck (Plus (Nat 1) (Nat 2)).
Eval simpl in typeCheck (Plus (Nat 1) (Bool false)).
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment